One of the complexities tenants face when entering an office lease involves understanding the measurement of their space for calculating rent. While this might seem like a simple square-footage calculation, it is usually anything but. In multi-tenant buildings, the number of square feet tenants “rent” is higher than the number of square feet they “use”, typically by as much as 7% to 20%. This article will help you understand the methodology behind different square footage calculations and the concepts to help you make better-informed leasing decisions.
Usable Square Feet Versus Rentable Square Feet
The usable square footage (USF) of an office suite is the space a tenant occupies. In most cases, this area is calculated as if interior walls and columns don’t exist. A tenant’s rentable square footage (RSF) is the USF plus a portion of the building’s shared or “common areas,” including lobbies, restrooms, hallways, telephone and electrical rooms, and perhaps shared conference rooms, work-out facilities and showers. Landlords require tenants to pay for their proportionate share of common areas and therefore the monthly rent is calculated on RSF.
The difference between the RSF and USF is referred to as the “load factor,” “loss factor”, “common area factor,” or “add-on factor.” Expressed as a ratio, a building’s load factor is calculated by dividing the RSF by the USF:
Load Factor = Rentable Square Feet (RSF) / Usable Square Feet (USF)
For example: a building measuring 200,000 square feet with 25,000 square feet of common area would contain 175,000 USF, and therefore have a load factor of 1.143 (200,000/175,000). One could also say the building has a load factor of 14.3%.
When evaluating office space options, tenants should compare load factors. Landlords, or their representatives should be able to provide these numbers. A lower factor is indicative of a more “efficient” building, giving the tenant more usable space for the rental dollar. However, if a more elaborate office environment with more spacious common areas is desired, a high load factor (as much as 20% or higher) could be acceptable.
Further complicating a tenant’s leasing decision is the fact that methods used by landlords to calculate USF and RSF can vary, making direct comparisons difficult to make. In most US cities USF and RSF are calculated in accordance with standards established by the Building Owners and Managers Association International (BOMA).
The lease proposals tenants request, and the eventual lease agreements they sign should list both USF and RSF for the suite and the entire building, as well as specify that the BOMA standard has been used in calculating these measurements. At JL Architects, we recommend that it be precisely spelled out as: “The Standard Method for Measuring Floor Area in Office Buildings published by the Building Owners and Managers Association International and approved by the American National Standards Institute, Inc., ANSI/BOMA Z65.1-2010.” Also acceptable is the “1996 BOMA Office Standard, ANSI/BOMA Z65.1-1996” which is still used by many landlords. To understand the slight variations between the two methods and determine which might be most advantageous in a given situation, tenants should consult a tenant-representative broker or a licensed architect.
Tenants should be very cautious about agreeing to methods of measurement other than the BOMA standard or any “modified” version of the BOMA standard. To do so allows the landlord full control over what is included or not included in the measurements.
“Trust, but Verify”
Even when the BOMA standard is used, it is wise to have a tenant-representative broker or a licensed architect review the calculations and associated floor plans to ensure that BOMA standards have been properly applied to the characteristics of the building. It’s not uncommon to find “grey” areas where some negotiation is warranted. When dealing with a large office lease—or if there is doubt concerning the accuracy of measurements provided by the landlord—tenants should consider having an architect take it one step further by field-measuring the space before they sign a lease.
Most tenants, and even a good number of landlord representatives, don’t fully understand the intricacies of determining RSF, and yet variations can lead to large differences in the amount of rent tenants pay–as much as $100,000 over the five-year life of a 25,000 RSF lease. In this and all other aspects of commercial real estate, it pays to make the extra effort to understand exactly what you’re paying for and exactly what you’re getting in return.
Hopefully you’ve found this information helpful for the next time you sign a new lease or negotiate an extension to your current lease. If such an event is approaching for your company, consider working with a tenant-representative broker who understands the complexities of commercial leases and can help you achieve the lowest costs and greatest benefits from your office space.
-Kipp Happ, Assoc. AIA, Project Manager